February 24th, 2011
Do you think the decision to choose which college to attend is your right as a student? That’s what some members of the U.S. House of Representatives argued recently when it came to a proposed rule threatening federal funding of career schools.
An amendment that passed the House on Feb. 18 would bar the U.S. Department of Education from using federal dollars to enforce rules that will link for-profit colleges’ ability to get funding to student outcomes and rates of loan repayment. For-profit colleges are the fastest-growing sector of higher education, accounting for more than 10 percent of postsecondary students, The Washington Post reported.
Reuters reported that the proposed rule would make schools more accountable for the $145 billion in federal dollars they get for student aid; they would have to prove they are doing a better job of preparing students for a career.
Supporters in the House argued that the delay of the proposed gainful employment rule would preserve students’ right to choose which college they attended, The Chronicle of Higher Education reported. It quoted Rep. John P. Kline Jr. (R-Minn.) as saying: “This is an assault on students’ ability to find a school that fits their needs.”
A Florida Democrat, Rep. Alcee L. Hastings, told the House that the rule would cause the closing of schools that train essential workers such as nurses and physical therapists, The Washington Post reported. He said: “What will happen to the single mother trying to change careers who wants the flexibility of a private-sector college?”
Groups such as the National Black Chamber of Commerce support the House’s amendment. It said in a press release: “This great victory will help stop a rule that would disproportionately hurt African American and other minority students who rely on career colleges to learn real-world skills that help them get jobs.”
The amendment is now headed to the Senate, so let’s keep watch of what happens.







